Difference between revisions of "TAXONOMY"

Revision as of 16:50, 20 March 2006 (view source)

Tyszka (talk | contribs)

← Older edit

Revision as of 16:55, 20 March 2006 (view source)

Tyszka (talk | contribs)

Newer edit →

Line 2:

{| width="100%" bgcolor="#fff4f4" id="toc"

−

!align="~~center~~" colspan="2"|Foraminiferal taxonomy is primarily based on the [[composition]] and morphology of the [[test]]. Unfortunately, "the division of the Foraminifera into subgroups is problematic; existing morphology-based schemes (e.g. Loeblich and Tappan 1988) are not fully consistent with molecular phylogenetic data ... Molecular analyses reveal that polythalamous tests evolved at least twice: in the lineage leading to a large radiation of agglutinated textulariids and calcareous rotaliids, and in the lineage

+

!align="left" colspan="2"|Foraminiferal taxonomy is primarily based on the [[composition]] and morphology of the [[test]]. Unfortunately, "the division of the Foraminifera into subgroups is problematic; existing morphology-based schemes (e.g. Loeblich and Tappan 1988) are not fully consistent with molecular phylogenetic data ... Molecular analyses reveal that polythalamous tests evolved at least twice: in the lineage leading to a large radiation of agglutinated textulariids and calcareous rotaliids, and in the lineage leading to miliolids, characterized by microgranular, low-Mg calcitic walls" (after [[BIBLIOGRAPHY|Pawlowski et al. 2003]]; from [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/jeu/52/5 Adl et al. 2005] - p.418).

−

leading to miliolids, characterized by microgranular, low-Mg calcitic walls" (after [[BIBLIOGRAPHY|Pawlowski et al. 2003]]; from [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/jeu/52/5 Adl et al. 2005] - p.418).

|}

Difference between revisions of "TAXONOMY"

Revision as of 16:55, 20 March 2006

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

More

Search

Navigation

Tools

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 {| width="100%" bgcolor="#fff4f4" id="toc"
-!align="center" colspan="2"|Foraminiferal taxonomy is primarily based on the [[composition]] and morphology of the [[test]]. Unfortunately, "the division of the Foraminifera into subgroups is problematic; existing morphology-based schemes (e.g. Loeblich and Tappan 1988) are not fully consistent with molecular phylogenetic data ... Molecular analyses reveal that polythalamous tests evolved at least twice: in the lineage leading to a large radiation of agglutinated textulariids and calcareous rotaliids, and in the lineage
+!align="left" colspan="2"|Foraminiferal taxonomy is primarily based on the [[composition]] and morphology of the [[test]]. Unfortunately, "the division of the Foraminifera into subgroups is problematic; existing morphology-based schemes (e.g. Loeblich and Tappan 1988) are not fully consistent with molecular phylogenetic data ... Molecular analyses reveal that polythalamous tests evolved at least twice: in the lineage leading to a large radiation of agglutinated textulariids and calcareous rotaliids, and in the lineage leading to miliolids, characterized by microgranular, low-Mg calcitic walls" (after [[BIBLIOGRAPHY|Pawlowski et al. 2003]]; from [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/jeu/52/5 Adl et al. 2005] - p.418).
-leading to miliolids, characterized by microgranular, low-Mg calcitic walls" (after [[BIBLIOGRAPHY|Pawlowski et al. 2003]]; from [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/jeu/52/5 Adl et al. 2005] - p.418).
 |}