Difference between revisions of "RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON FORAMINIFERA"
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
----Gertsch, B., Keller, G., Adatte, T. and Berner, Z., 2013. [http://jgs.lyellcollection.org/content/170/2/249.abstract The Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary (KTB) transition in NE Brazil]. Journal of the Geological Society 170 (5), 249-262. | ----Gertsch, B., Keller, G., Adatte, T. and Berner, Z., 2013. [http://jgs.lyellcollection.org/content/170/2/249.abstract The Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary (KTB) transition in NE Brazil]. Journal of the Geological Society 170 (5), 249-262. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==THE PHYLOGENETIC AND PALAEOGEOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION OF MIOGYPSINIDS== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <font size="2"> | ||
| + | Access to new material from South Africa, Corsica, Cyprus, Syria and Sumatra has allowed a systematic biostratigraphic comparison and correlation of the miogypsinids from the Mediterranean–West Africa and the Indo-Pacific provinces, and for the first time from South Africa. Twelve new species have been identified ......During the Chattian and Aquitanian significant miogypsinid forms evolved in the Mediterranean from the morphologically distinct Mediterranean ''Neorotalia'' and migrated, within a few million years of their first appearance, into the Indo-Pacific, where they diversified further. The tectonically driven closure of the seaway between the Mediterranean and the Indo-Pacific in the Burdigalian triggered the extinction of Mediterranean miogypsinids in the Langhian. Miogypsinids survived in the Indo-Pacific into the Serravallian. | ||
| + | <font size="2">([http://jgs.lyellcollection.org/content/170/1/185.abstract ABSTRACT]) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ----Boudagher-Fadel, M.K. ad Price, G.D., 2013. [http://jgs.lyellcollection.org/content/170/1/185.abstract The phylogenetic and palaeogeographic evolution of the miogypsinid larger benthic foraminifera]. Journal of the Geological Society 170 (5), 185-208. | ||
