Difference between revisions of "RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON FORAMINIFERA 2011 (5)"

Revision as of 20:17, 27 March 2012 (view source)

Setoyama (talk | contribs)

← Older edit

Revision as of 20:24, 27 March 2012 (view source)

Setoyama (talk | contribs)

Newer edit →

Line 2:

'''[[RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON FORAMINIFERA|RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON FORAMINIFERA]] | [[RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON FORAMINIFERA 2012 (1)|2012 (1)]] | [[RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON FORAMINIFERA 2011 (4)|2011 (4)]] | [[RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON FORAMINIFERA 2011 (3)|2011 (3)]] | [[RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON FORAMINIFERA 2011 (2)|2011 (2)]] | [[RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON FORAMINIFERA 2011 (1)|2011 (1)]] | [[RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON FORAMINIFERA 2010|2010]]'''

+

==''Sanctus sinaicus'', A NEW AMPHISTEGINID FROM THE UPPER EOCENE OF EGYPT ==

+

[[Image:Micropaleontology_front.jpg‎|left|80px| ]]

+

''Sanctus sinaicus'' nov. gen et sp. is described from material collected in the uppermost part of the Khaboba Formation and throughout the Tanka and Tayiba formations of Wadi Thal and Wadi Matulla in West–Central Sinai. We assign this new genus and species to the Late Eocene according to associated planktonic foraminiferal assemblages. Its test is symmetrical in axial section with the division of chambers in the same section similar to that of amphisteginids in their early ontogenetic stage and lacks a canal system. In comparing ''Sanctus sinaicus'' with related amphistegenid species, such as ''Penoperculoides cubaensis'' Cole and Gravell 1952 from the Caribbean; ''Penoperculoides rozlozsniki'' (Méhes) ( ex: ''Nummulites rozlozsniki'' Méhes) from Hungary; and “Non ''Nummulites rozlozsniki''” described by Sander 1962, from the Dammam Formation of Saudi Arabia, we find that ''Sanctus sinaicus'' is similar to ''P. cubaensis'' in the type of coiling and the character of the umbo, which lacks alar prolongations, a canal system and transverse trabeculae, and differs from species of ''Nummulites'' in the central subdivision of chambers.

+

([http://www.micropress.org/micro_journal.html ABSTRACT])

+

---- Boukhary, M., Abf-Elshafi, E., Mattar, Y., 2011. [http://www.micropress.org/micro_journal.html ''Sanctus sinaicus'' n. gen., n. sp. (Foraminiferida, Amphisteginidae) from Late Eocene of Sinai, Egypt]. Micropaleontology 57 (6), 537--542.

Line 10:

Line 19:

([http://www.micropress.org/micro_journal.html ABSTRACT])

−

---- Setoyama, E., Kaminski, M.A., Tyszka, J., 2011. [http://www.micropress.org/micro_journal.html Campanian agglutinated foraminifera from the Lomonosov Ridge, IODP Expedition 302, ACEX, in the paleogeographic context of the Arctic Ocean]. Micropaleontology 57 (6), 507--530..

+

---- Setoyama, E., Kaminski, M.A., Tyszka, J., 2011. [http://www.micropress.org/micro_journal.html Campanian agglutinated foraminifera from the Lomonosov Ridge, IODP Expedition 302, ACEX, in the paleogeographic context of the Arctic Ocean]. Micropaleontology 57 (6), 507--530.

Difference between revisions of "RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON FORAMINIFERA 2011 (5)"

Revision as of 20:24, 27 March 2012

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

More

Search

Navigation

Tools

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 <font size="4">
 '''[[RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON FORAMINIFERA|RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON FORAMINIFERA]] | [[RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON FORAMINIFERA 2012 (1)|2012 (1)]] | [[RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON FORAMINIFERA 2011 (4)|2011 (4)]] | [[RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON FORAMINIFERA 2011 (3)|2011 (3)]] | [[RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON FORAMINIFERA 2011 (2)|2011 (2)]] | [[RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON FORAMINIFERA 2011 (1)|2011 (1)]] | [[RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON FORAMINIFERA 2010|2010]]'''<font size="2">
+==''Sanctus sinaicus'',  A NEW AMPHISTEGINID FROM THE UPPER EOCENE OF EGYPT ==
+[[Image:Micropaleontology_front.jpg‎|left|80px| ]]<font size="2">
+''Sanctus sinaicus'' nov. gen et sp. is described from material collected in the uppermost part of the Khaboba Formation and throughout the Tanka and Tayiba formations of Wadi Thal and Wadi Matulla in West–Central Sinai. We assign this new genus and species to the Late Eocene according to associated planktonic foraminiferal assemblages. Its test is symmetrical in axial section with the division of chambers in the same section similar to that of amphisteginids in their early ontogenetic stage and lacks a canal system. In comparing ''Sanctus sinaicus'' with related amphistegenid species, such as ''Penoperculoides cubaensis'' Cole and Gravell 1952 from the Caribbean; ''Penoperculoides rozlozsniki'' (Méhes) ( ex: ''Nummulites rozlozsniki'' Méhes) from Hungary; and “Non ''Nummulites rozlozsniki''” described by Sander 1962, from the Dammam Formation of Saudi Arabia, we find that ''Sanctus sinaicus'' is similar to ''P. cubaensis'' in the type of coiling and the character of the umbo, which lacks alar prolongations, a canal system and transverse trabeculae, and differs from species of ''Nummulites'' in the central subdivision of chambers.
+<font size="2">([http://www.micropress.org/micro_journal.html ABSTRACT])
+---- Boukhary, M., Abf-Elshafi, E., Mattar, Y., 2011. [http://www.micropress.org/micro_journal.html ''Sanctus sinaicus'' n. gen., n. sp. (Foraminiferida, Amphisteginidae) from Late Eocene of Sinai, Egypt]. Micropaleontology 57 (6), 537--542.
@@ Line 10: / Line 19: @@
 <font size="2">([http://www.micropress.org/micro_journal.html ABSTRACT])
----- Setoyama, E., Kaminski, M.A., Tyszka, J., 2011. [http://www.micropress.org/micro_journal.html Campanian agglutinated foraminifera from the Lomonosov Ridge, IODP Expedition 302, ACEX, in the paleogeographic context of the Arctic Ocean]. Micropaleontology 57 (6), 507--530..
+---- Setoyama, E., Kaminski, M.A., Tyszka, J., 2011. [http://www.micropress.org/micro_journal.html Campanian agglutinated foraminifera from the Lomonosov Ridge, IODP Expedition 302, ACEX, in the paleogeographic context of the Arctic Ocean]. Micropaleontology 57 (6), 507--530.