Difference between revisions of "TAXONOMY"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{| width="100%" bgcolor="#fff4f4" id="toc" | {| width="100%" bgcolor="#fff4f4" id="toc" | ||
!align="center" colspan="2"|Foraminiferal taxonomy is primarily based on the [[composition]] and morphology of the [[test]]. Unfortunately, "the division of the Foraminifera into subgroups is problematic; existing morphology-based schemes (e.g. Loeblich and Tappan 1988) are not fully consistent with molecular phylogenetic data ... Molecular analyses reveal that polythalamous tests evolved at least twice: in the lineage leading to a large radiation of agglutinated textulariids and calcareous rotaliids, and in the lineage | !align="center" colspan="2"|Foraminiferal taxonomy is primarily based on the [[composition]] and morphology of the [[test]]. Unfortunately, "the division of the Foraminifera into subgroups is problematic; existing morphology-based schemes (e.g. Loeblich and Tappan 1988) are not fully consistent with molecular phylogenetic data ... Molecular analyses reveal that polythalamous tests evolved at least twice: in the lineage leading to a large radiation of agglutinated textulariids and calcareous rotaliids, and in the lineage | ||
| − | leading to miliolids, characterized by microgranular, low-Mg calcitic walls" (after [BIBLIOGRAPHY|Pawlowski et al. 2003]; from [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/jeu/52/5 Adl et al. 2005] - p.418). | + | leading to miliolids, characterized by microgranular, low-Mg calcitic walls" (after [[BIBLIOGRAPHY|Pawlowski et al. 2003]]; from [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/jeu/52/5 Adl et al. 2005] - p.418). |
|} | |} | ||
