Difference between revisions of "1D-morphospace"

From Foraminifera
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
In order to understand general behavior in morphospace, it is best to focus on a deterministic model based on non-random parameters. It seems clear that simulated shell morphology is very sensitive to changes of the deviation angle (Δφ, deflection angle) parameter. Therefore, discrete steps of ( )i from  to  have been chosen to test the response of morphotypes to different values of this parameter. Two other two parameters are set constant (i.e.  ;  ) for all simulated forms and for all time steps. The resulting variability of shell patterns reveals four areas (phases) of characteristic morphologies (see Fig. below after [[REFERENCES|Topa & Tyszka, 2005]] - fig. 12):
 
In order to understand general behavior in morphospace, it is best to focus on a deterministic model based on non-random parameters. It seems clear that simulated shell morphology is very sensitive to changes of the deviation angle (Δφ, deflection angle) parameter. Therefore, discrete steps of ( )i from  to  have been chosen to test the response of morphotypes to different values of this parameter. Two other two parameters are set constant (i.e.  ;  ) for all simulated forms and for all time steps. The resulting variability of shell patterns reveals four areas (phases) of characteristic morphologies (see Fig. below after [[REFERENCES|Topa & Tyszka, 2005]] - fig. 12):
: - biserial forms (Δφ varies from 0 to 38.844^),  
+
: - biserial forms (Δφ varies from 0 to 38.844; ^),  
 
: - mixed forms (Δφ from 38.862 to 54.324),  
 
: - mixed forms (Δφ from 38.862 to 54.324),  
 
: - trochospiral forms (Δφ from 54.342 to 158.814),  
 
: - trochospiral forms (Δφ from 54.342 to 158.814),  

Revision as of 17:47, 2 March 2006