Difference between revisions of "1D-morphospace"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
In order to understand general behavior in morphospace, it is best to focus on a deterministic model based on non-random parameters. It seems clear that simulated shell morphology is very sensitive to changes of the deviation angle (DeltaFi, deflection angle) parameter. Therefore, discrete steps of ( )i from to have been chosen to test the response of morphotypes to different values of this parameter. Two other two parameters are set constant (i.e. ; ) for all simulated forms and for all time steps. The resulting variability of shell patterns reveals four areas (phases) of characteristic morphologies (see Fig. below after [[REFERENCES|Topa & Tyszka, 2005]] - fig. 12): | In order to understand general behavior in morphospace, it is best to focus on a deterministic model based on non-random parameters. It seems clear that simulated shell morphology is very sensitive to changes of the deviation angle (DeltaFi, deflection angle) parameter. Therefore, discrete steps of ( )i from to have been chosen to test the response of morphotypes to different values of this parameter. Two other two parameters are set constant (i.e. ; ) for all simulated forms and for all time steps. The resulting variability of shell patterns reveals four areas (phases) of characteristic morphologies (see Fig. below after [[REFERENCES|Topa & Tyszka, 2005]] - fig. 12): | ||
| − | : - biserial forms (DeltaFi varies from 0 to | + | : - biserial forms (DeltaFi varies from 0 to 38.7), |
: - mixed forms (DeltaFi from to ), | : - mixed forms (DeltaFi from to ), | ||
: - trochospiral forms (DeltaFi from to ), | : - trochospiral forms (DeltaFi from to ), | ||
