Difference between revisions of "1D-morphospace"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Although detailed morphospace analysis is beyond the scope of this paper, it is reasonable to test how the model reacts to changing parameters. In order to understand general behavior in morphospace, it is best to focus on a deterministic model based on non-random parameters. It seems clear that simulated shell morphology is very sensitive to changes of the deviation angle ( )i parameter. Therefore, discrete steps of ( )i from to have been chosen to test the response of morphotypes to different values of this parameter. Two other two parameters are set constant (i.e. ; ) for all simulated forms and for all time steps. The resulting variability of shell patterns reveals four areas (phases) of characteristic morphologies (Fig. 12): | Although detailed morphospace analysis is beyond the scope of this paper, it is reasonable to test how the model reacts to changing parameters. In order to understand general behavior in morphospace, it is best to focus on a deterministic model based on non-random parameters. It seems clear that simulated shell morphology is very sensitive to changes of the deviation angle ( )i parameter. Therefore, discrete steps of ( )i from to have been chosen to test the response of morphotypes to different values of this parameter. Two other two parameters are set constant (i.e. ; ) for all simulated forms and for all time steps. The resulting variability of shell patterns reveals four areas (phases) of characteristic morphologies (Fig. 12): | ||
| − | |||
* biserial forms (DeltaFi varies from to ), | * biserial forms (DeltaFi varies from to ), | ||
* mixed forms (DeltaFi from to ), | * mixed forms (DeltaFi from to ), | ||
